<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:podcast="https://podcastindex.org/namespace/1.0" version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<atom:link href="https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/podcast/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2026 21:13:37 +0200</lastBuildDate>
	<title><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></title>
	<link>https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/</link>
	<language>en-EN</language>
	<copyright><![CDATA[]]></copyright>
	<itunes:subtitle><![CDATA[Podcast of hubbardbro]]></itunes:subtitle>
	<itunes:author><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></itunes:author>
	<googleplay:author><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></googleplay:author>
	<itunes:summary><![CDATA[]]></itunes:summary>
	<googleplay:description><![CDATA[]]></googleplay:description>
	<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
	<itunes:owner>
	<itunes:name><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></itunes:name>
	<itunes:email>contact@hearthis.at</itunes:email>
	</itunes:owner>
	<googleplay:image href="https://img.hearthis.at/0/7/8/_/uploads/dummy/user/w1400_h1400_q70_ptrue_v2_----cropped_user_00870.png"/>
	<itunes:image href="https://img.hearthis.at/0/7/8/_/uploads/dummy/user/w1400_h1400_q70_ptrue_v2_----cropped_user_00870.png" />
    <googleplay:owner>contact@hearthis.at</googleplay:owner>
	
	<googleplay:explicit>no</googleplay:explicit>
	<itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
	<category><![CDATA[Sounds]]></category>
	<googleplay:category text="Sounds"/>
	<itunes:category text="Sounds"/>
	<itunes:keywords><![CDATA[]]></itunes:keywords>
	
	
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[Drum]]></title>
            <link>https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/renaissance-drum/</link>
            <itunes:author><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></itunes:author>
            <description><![CDATA[theories that better describe how the Universe we know actually behaves. As for the powerful belief in some scientific dogmas, often expressed by scientists, it also seems to have strong justification, even when it is a belief in the application of these dogmas in circumstances that go far beyond the original context in which they were obtained strong observational confirmation. Sometimes, outstanding physical theories from the past will maintain their great precision even when in certain cases they have been replaced by better theories that have a [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) wider range of applicability or greater precision. This was certainly the case when Newton's great theory of gravity was confronted with Einstein's theory; or when the beautiful Maxwellian electromagnetic theory of light was replaced by its own quantized version, which made it possible to understand the molecular aspect of light (photons). In any such case, the previous theory remains trustworthy, as long as its limitations are constantly remembered.]]></description>
            <googleplay:description><![CDATA[theories that better describe how the Universe we know actually behaves. As for the powerful belief in some scientific dogmas, often expressed by scientists, it also seems to have strong justification, even when it is a belief in the application of these dogmas in circumstances that go far beyond the original context in which they were obtained strong observational confirmation. Sometimes, outstanding physical theories from the past will maintain their great precision even when in certain cases they have been replaced by better theories that have a [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) wider range of applicability or greater precision. This was certainly the case when Newton's great theory of gravity was confronted with Einstein's theory; or when the beautiful Maxwellian electromagnetic theory of light was replaced by its own quantized version, which made it possible to understand the molecular aspect of light (photons). In any such case, the previous theory remains trustworthy, as long as its limitations are constantly remembered.]]></googleplay:description>
            <itunes:summary><![CDATA[theories that better describe how the Universe we know actually behaves. As for the powerful belief in some scientific dogmas, often expressed by scientists, it also seems to have strong justification, even when it is a belief in the application of these dogmas in circumstances that go far beyond the original context in which they were obtained strong observational confirmation. Sometimes, outstanding physical theories from the past will maintain their great precision even when in certain cases they have been replaced by better theories that have a [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) wider range of applicability or greater precision. This was certainly the case when Newton's great theory of gravity was confronted with Einstein's theory; or when the beautiful Maxwellian electromagnetic theory of light was replaced by its own quantized version, which made it possible to understand the molecular aspect of light (photons). In any such case, the previous theory remains trustworthy, as long as its limitations are constantly remembered.]]></itunes:summary>
            <itunes:image href="https://img.hearthis.at/0/7/8/_/uploads/dummy/user/w1400_h1400_q70_ptrue_v2_----cropped_user_00870.png" />
            <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/renaissance-drum/listen.mp3?s=2rG" length="1158719" />
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4434202</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[Sounds]]></category>
            <googleplay:explicit>no</googleplay:explicit>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            
            
            
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:02:23 +0100</pubDate>
                
                <atom:updated>2020-03-01T00:02:23+01:00</atom:updated>
                
            
            
            <itunes:duration>0:48</itunes:duration>
        </item>
        <item>
            <title><![CDATA[ Sample Pack -]]></title>
            <link>https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/drive-sample-pack-/</link>
            <itunes:author><![CDATA[hubbardbro]]></itunes:author>
            <description><![CDATA[ What about fantasy? Is it not obvious that in science we should strive for something completely opposite? In the rest of the book, however, it will be said that some of the basic features of the natural world are so amazing and bizarre (though not everyone is always aware that this is the case) that if we did not indulge in something that may seem like a crazy act sometimes fantasy, we would have no chance to understand the truth, which at first glance may seem unbelievably fantastic. In the first three chapters I intend to illustrate these three title phenomena using [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) three well-known theories or families of theories. I did not choose areas of relatively small importance for physics for this, because I am particularly interested in big fish in the ocean of modern theoretical physics. In the first chapter I decided to refer to the still highly fashionable string theory (or superstrings, or its generalizations, like M-theory, or the most]]></description>
            <googleplay:description><![CDATA[ What about fantasy? Is it not obvious that in science we should strive for something completely opposite? In the rest of the book, however, it will be said that some of the basic features of the natural world are so amazing and bizarre (though not everyone is always aware that this is the case) that if we did not indulge in something that may seem like a crazy act sometimes fantasy, we would have no chance to understand the truth, which at first glance may seem unbelievably fantastic. In the first three chapters I intend to illustrate these three title phenomena using [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) three well-known theories or families of theories. I did not choose areas of relatively small importance for physics for this, because I am particularly interested in big fish in the ocean of modern theoretical physics. In the first chapter I decided to refer to the still highly fashionable string theory (or superstrings, or its generalizations, like M-theory, or the most]]></googleplay:description>
            <itunes:summary><![CDATA[ What about fantasy? Is it not obvious that in science we should strive for something completely opposite? In the rest of the book, however, it will be said that some of the basic features of the natural world are so amazing and bizarre (though not everyone is always aware that this is the case) that if we did not indulge in something that may seem like a crazy act sometimes fantasy, we would have no chance to understand the truth, which at first glance may seem unbelievably fantastic. In the first three chapters I intend to illustrate these three title phenomena using [tees for men](https://failfake.com/en/31-men-s-t-shirt-graphic-printing) three well-known theories or families of theories. I did not choose areas of relatively small importance for physics for this, because I am particularly interested in big fish in the ocean of modern theoretical physics. In the first chapter I decided to refer to the still highly fashionable string theory (or superstrings, or its generalizations, like M-theory, or the most]]></itunes:summary>
            <itunes:image href="https://img.hearthis.at/0/7/8/_/uploads/dummy/user/w1400_h1400_q70_ptrue_v2_----cropped_user_00870.png" />
            <enclosure type="audio/mpeg" url="https://hearthis.at/hubbardbro/drive-sample-pack-/listen.mp3?s=yGd" length="1733622" />
            <guid isPermaLink="false">4434203</guid>
            <category><![CDATA[Sounds]]></category>
            <googleplay:explicit>no</googleplay:explicit>
            <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
            
            
            
                <pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2020 00:02:23 +0100</pubDate>
                
                <atom:updated>2020-03-01T00:02:23+01:00</atom:updated>
                
            
            
            <itunes:duration>1:12</itunes:duration>
        </item>
    </channel>
</rss>