Thu, 23 Apr 2026 18:20:07 +0200 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/ en-EN contact@hearthis.at contact@hearthis.at https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/ https://img.hearthis.at/7/9/6/_/uploads/8921686/image_user/w1400_h1400_q70_ptrue_v2_----cropped_1506601697.jpg no no https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no01korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.
But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...
Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface
I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
Particularly the 🎀 ribbon 🎀 controller.
🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.
But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...
Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface
I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
Particularly the 🎀 ribbon 🎀 controller.
🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561830 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:33:53 +0200 2017-10-08T00:33:53+02:00 7:03 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no02korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.

🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.

🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561828 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:36:50 +0200 2017-10-08T00:36:50+02:00 6:08 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no03korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.

Using an external Eurorack LFO for slow clocking.
🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.

Using an external Eurorack LFO for slow clocking.
🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561827 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:37:08 +0200 2017-10-08T00:37:08+02:00 5:26 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no04korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.
The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561826 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:37:15 +0200 2017-10-08T00:37:15+02:00 4:50 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no05korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.

This time two in series.

The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [2x SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.

This time two in series.

The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [2x SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561829 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:37:10 +0200 2017-10-08T00:37:10+02:00 7:22 https://hearthis.at/computing.sound-aw/exploring-black-holes-19122016-no06korg-monotribe-zoom-ms-70cdr/ Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.

Again two in series.

The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [2x SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> Exploring the MS-70's SpaceHole algorithm.

Again two in series.

The manual states that it's based on the Eventide SPACE BlackHole algorithm, which according to Eventide's website originated their 4000 series Ultra-Harmonizers rack-mount units.
There's also a plugin from Eventide called Blackhole.

But here I stick to the Zoom pedal. Although the plugin might also get me in the future...

Korg monotribe ➡ Zoom MS-70CDR [2x SpaceHole] ➡ audio interface

I love the combination of the two units.
Both small.
Both relatively affordable.

And as much the monotribe's (insert basic synthesizer or sound source of your choice) limitations can frustate for some uses, in this case they make it quite fantastic and a lot of fun, at least for me.
🛰🕳🔈]]> 1561831 no no Sun, 08 Oct 2017 00:37:21 +0200 2017-10-08T00:37:21+02:00 10:54